广告服务 新浪微博 腾讯微博 微信公众号 欢迎投稿
首页 | 资讯 内控 财会 文库 服务 考试 法规 图片 视频 投稿信箱:tougao@shenji.cn 设为首页 | 收藏本站
文库频道
Corporate governance – could your board be better informed about internal audit?

    Corporate governance in the UK has recently been issued a series of challenges that could have major implications for the internal audit profession. Many, although not all, of these have been in the financial services sector.

•The Salz Review commissioned by Barclays into its business practices raised concerns that some governance and control issues had not been identified early enough and suggested that internal audit had not been sufficiently risk-based.

•The FSA report into rogue trading in UBS concluded that there had been serious weaknesses in the firm's procedures, management systems and internal controls.

•The Parliamentary Commission’s report on HBOS pointed to failures in internal control and risk management and a lack of central challenge.

•The Ofgem report on SSE’s mis-selling of energy contracts concluded that senior management should have been aware of the breaches, and that many breaches concerned inadequate monitoring and control arrangements over the behaviour of SSE’s sales agents.

    What these, and other examples, have in common is that internal audit did not appear to be positioned, tasked or resourced properly to act as the effective eyes and ears of the board and the third line of defence in managing organisational risk.

    As many will know, in the financial services sector the institute is in the process of preparing a code of practice based on the recommendations of a committee chaired by Roger Marshall. This is in direct response to FSA concerns about the role of internal audit. The committee will report in the summer.

    In the meantime we have been working with the Institute of Directors on a new publication – “What every director should know about internal audit”. This document, based on work at European level, offers boards ten essential actions to ensure they maximise the value they get from internal audit and gain maximum protection and assurance from its activities. While this detailed guidance is produced primarily for private-sector organisations, boards in the public sector and third sector may also find it of value. We have sent copies to IIA heads of internal audit and to audit committee chairs in FTSE 350 companies.

    In summary the ten actions are


1.Evaluate the need for internal audit where it does not exist.
2.Assess and approve the internal audit charter (terms of reference) and review regularly.
3.Ensure a close working relationship with the head of internal audit, promoting effective formal and informal communication.
4.Assess the resourcing of the internal audit function.
5.Monitor the quality of internal audit work, both in-house and external.
6.Evaluate, approve and regularly review the risk-based annual internal audit plan.
7.Oversee the relationship between internal audit and centralised risk monitoring.
8.Ensure the collective assurance roles of internal audit, other internal assurance providers and external audit, are coordinated and optimised.
9.Assess internal audit findings and the breadth and depth of internal audit reports.
10.Monitor management implementation of internal audit recommendations.

  • 上一条文章:

  • 下一条文章:
  • 热点新闻
    国家级期刊论文写作指导及发表
    公开刊号、公开发行、国家出版总局可查
    联系人:徐老师、林老师
    电话:020-29008322
    在线交流: 点击这里给我发消息 点击这里给我发消息
    中国审计网中文网址:审计网.中国 中文域名:中国审计网.com
    电信与信息服务业务与电子公告BBS经营许可证:B2-20050153号
    Copyright @ 2000-2014 www.shenji.cn All Rights Reserved.